PENGARUH KEPEMIMPINAN YANG MELAYANI TERHADAP PERILAKU INOVASI KERJA PEGAWAI PADA SEKTOR PUBLIK DENGAN ALIRAN DI TEMPAT KERJA SEBAGAI VARIABEL INTERVENING

Riza Dwi Agni, Era Miftakhul Jannah

Abstrak


Tujuan penelitian untuk menganalisis pengaruh langsung dan tidak langsung dari kepemimpinan yang melayani pada perilaku inovasi kerja, dengan variabel aliran di tempat kerja sebagai mediasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan sumber data primer yang dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner online. Metode purposive sampling digunakan sebagai teknik pengambilan sampel dan diperoleh sebanyak 142 sampel eligible. Analisis data dilakukan dengan metode Structural Equation Modelling Partial Least Square (SEM-PLS) dengan bantuan program SmartPLS 3.0. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tidak terdapat pengaruh langsung yang signifikan dari kepemimpinan yang melayani pada perilaku inovasi kerja. Sementara itu, kepemimpinan yang melayani memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan pada aliran di tempat kerja. Pengaruh signifikan juga ditemukan pada hubungan antara aliran di tempat kerja dengan perilaku inovasi kerja. Selanjutnya peran mediasi aliran di tempat kerja secara signifikan berpengaruh pada hubungan antara kepemimpinan yang melayani dengan perilaku inovasi kerja. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa peran mediasi aliran di tempat kerja sangat penting karena ketika tidak terdapat aliran di tempat kerja sebagai variabel mediasi, maka hubungan antara kepemimpinan yang melayani dengan perilaku inovasi kerja menjadi tidak signifikan.

Kata Kunci


Kepemimpinan yang melayani, aliran di tempat kerja, perilaku inovasi kerja.

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


BKN. (2022). Statistik ASN Desember 2021. Badan Kepegawaian Negara.

Cai, W., Lysova, E. I., Khapova, S. N., & Bossink, B. A. G. (2018). The effects of servant leadership, meaningful work and job autonomy on inovative work behavior in Chinese high-tech firms: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01767

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience (Nachdr (ed.)). Harper and Row.

de Jong, J., & den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring inovative work behaviour. Creativity and Inovation Management, 19(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x

Dierendonck, D. van. (2010). Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1228–1261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310380462

Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2018). Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004

Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218

Gabris, G. T., Golembiewski, R. T., & Ihrke, D. M. (2000). Leadership credibility, board relations, and administrative innovation at the local government level. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003496

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). In L. Fargotstein (Ed.), Sage (Second edi). Sage Publisher.

Iqbal, A., Latif, K. F., & Ahmad, M. S. (2020). Servant leadership and employee innovative behaviour: exploring psychological pathways. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 41(6), 813–827. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-11-2019-0474

Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness nd inovative work behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287–302.

Keller, J., & Bless, H. (2008). Flow and regulatory compatibility: An experimental approach to the flow model of intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(2), 196–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207310026

Khan, M. M., Mubarik, M. S., Ahmed, S. S., Islam, T., & Khan, E. (2021). Innovation with flow at work: exploring the role of servant leadership in affecting innovative work behavior through flow at work. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 42(8), 1267–1281. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-05-2021-0236

Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Liao, C., & Meuser, J. D. (2014). Servant leadership and serving culture: Influence on individual and unit performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1434–1452. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0034

Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Meuser, J. D., Hu, J., Wu, J., & Liao, C. (2015). Servant leadership: Validation of a short form of the SL-28. Leadership Quarterly, 26(2), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.12.002

Li, F., Liu, B., Lin, W., Wei, X., & Xu, Z. (2021). How and when servant leadership promotes service innovation: A moderated mediation model. Tourism Management, 86(July 2020), 104358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104358

Liu, D., Jiang, K., Shalley, C. E., Keem, S., & Zhou, J. (2016). Motivational mechanisms of employee creativity: A meta-analytic examination and theoretical extension of the creativity literature. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 137, 236–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.08.001

Madrid-Guijarro, A., Garcia, D., & Van Auken, H. (2009). Barriers to inovation among spanish manufacturing SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(4), 465–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2009.00279.x

Mansury, M. A., & Love, J. H. (2008). Inovation, productivity and growth in US business services: A firm-level analysis. Technovation, 28(1–2), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.06.002

Mulgan, G., & Albury, D. (2013). Inovation in the public sector. Inovation Policy Challenges. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203084243-11

Ruiz-Palomino, P., Hernández-Perlines, F., Jiménez-Estévez, P., & Gutiérrez-Broncano, S. (2019). CEO servant leadership and firm innovativeness in hotels: A multiple mediation model of encouragement of participation and employees’ voice. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(4), 1647–1665. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-01-2018-0023

Schiepe, A., & Engeser, S. (2017). Flow at work: Measurement and implication (C. Fullagar & A. D. Fave (eds.); First edit). Routledge.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approacg. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2003). Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 703–714. https://doi.org/10.5465/30040662

Urbancova, H. (2013). Competitive Advantage Achievement through Inovation and Knowledge. Journal of Competitiveness, 5(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2013.01.06

Vries, H. de, Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209

Zubair, A., & Kamal, A. (2015). Work related flow, psychological capital, and creativity among employees of software houses. Psychological Studies, 60(3), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-015-0330-x




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.52353/ama.v15i2.319

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Riza Dwi Agni, Era Miftakhul Jannah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

AMONG MAKARTI : JURNAL EKONOMI DAN BISNIS

SEKOLAH TINGGI ILMU EKONOMI AMA SALATIGA

 jurnalama@stieama.ac.id

 www.stieama.ac.id

 (0298)321013

 Jl. Diponegoro No.39, Salatiga, Kec. Sidorejo, Kota Salatiga, Jawa Tengah 

TERINDEKS :

          

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.