Review Process

The Among Makarti Journal applies the following peer-review process:

1. All manuscripts submitted by authors undergo an initial editorial screening, particularly to assess their suitability for the journal's scope and compliance with the journal's manuscript template and submission guidelines. During this stage, the editor may communicate with the author(s) to request revisions or clarification to ensure that the manuscript is suitable for peer review. Manuscripts that do not meet the journal's requirements may be returned to the author(s) or declined.
2. Manuscripts that pass the initial editorial screening are sent to two reviewers who have relevant expertise in the subject area. The manuscript is evaluated using a double-blind peer-review process, in which the identities of both the authors and reviewers are kept confidential.
3. To maintain the journal's standards regarding academic integrity and plagiarism, the Among Makarti Journal uses Plagiarism Checker X as a plagiarism detection tool.
4. The peer-review process considers several aspects of the manuscript, including novelty, objectivity, methodology, scientific impact, conclusions, and the quality and relevance of references.
5. Reviewers provide recommendations regarding necessary revisions and may recommend that the manuscript be accepted or rejected.
6. The editor makes the final editorial decision by taking into consideration the reviewers' recommendations and determining whether the manuscript meets the publication requirements and standards of the Among Makarti Journal.
7. The editor's decision is final.